The film received mostly negative reviews, garnering a 16% approval rating at Rotten Tomatoes;[28] the tenth worst of 2006.[29] The Seattle Times described it as "technically accomplished, but fairly lifeless and at times a bit silly".[30] The Hollywood Reporter said the world of Eragon was "without much texture or depth".[31] The story was labelled "derivative" by The Washington Post,[32] and "generic" by the Las Vegas Weekly.[33]Newsday stressed this point further, asserting that only "nine-year-olds with no knowledge whatsoever of any of the six Star Wars movies" would find the film original.[34]The acting was called "lame" by the Washington Post,[32] as well as "stilted" and "lifeless" by the Orlando Weekly.[35] The dialogue was also criticized: MSNBC labelled it "silly";[36] the Las Vegas Weekly called it "wooden".[33] Positive reviews described the film as "fun"[37] and "the stuff boys' fantasies are made of".[38] The CGI work was called "imaginative" and Saphira was called a "magnificent creation".[39] Paolini stated he enjoyed the film, particularly praising the performances of Jeremy Irons and Ed Speleers.[40]
eragon part 2 movie free 21
2ff7e9595c
Comments